Introduction:
As Turkey faces an uphill economic battle, President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s recent Gulf tour – covering Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) – has painted a vivid tableau of diplomatic tact and pragmatic opportunism. Erdogan’s diplomatic mission underscores an intriguing confluence of economic desperation and strategic maneuvering.
Firstly, Erdogan’s outreach to Saudi Arabia and the UAE signals a radical departure from past antagonisms. The pragmatic pivot towards these nations, formerly viewed as rivals, illustrates the changing calculus of Turkey’s foreign policy. The joint statement released by the Saudi Press Agency (SPA) emphasizes the key areas of planned Saudi-Turkish cooperation, including energy, health, logistics, science, security, and tourism. Noteworthy among the myriad collaborations is the significant defense pact with Saudi Arabia. The agreement, involving Turkey’s largest-ever aviation and defense export contract, highlights the intersection of economic pragmatism and strategic planning in Erdogan’s diplomacy.
In Qatar, Erdogan found an ally who has steadfastly supported Turkey during challenging times. Commemorating 50 years of bilateral relations, Erdogan and Qatari Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani resolved to strengthen trade and cooperation, further cementing their partnership.
In the UAE, Erdogan’s diplomatic overture yielded MOUs valued at around USD 50.7B. Under these MOUs, Emirati-Turkish defense and petroleum companies have committed to enhancing cooperation, signifying yet another major diplomatic win for Erdogan.
Despite these apparent successes, it’s crucial to probe beneath the surface and critically evaluate the geopolitical implications of Erdogan’s strategy. While the Gulf tour is widely viewed as pragmatic, some observers go as far as describing it as a “new chapter” of Emirati-Turkish relationship following “years of political rivalry.”
However, the complexities of Turkey’s historical involvement in the region must not be forgotten. Turkey’s support for pro-democracy movements post the 2011 Arab uprisings had placed it at odds with Saudi Arabia and the UAE. Its backing of Qatar during the Arab Quartet’s rift with Doha (2017-21) had further strained its relationships with Abu Dhabi and Riyadh. These historical factors, juxtaposed with the recent conciliatory overtures, expose the fluctuating alliances and partnerships in the region.
Interestingly, Erdogan’s Gulf tour comes at a time when both Saudi Arabia and the UAE perceive a US withdrawal from the region. This perception has led these Gulf nations to seek broader regional security partnerships, as evident from the major investments in the Turkish defense industry. Such a recalibration of alliances raises critical questions about the sustainability and long-term implications of these partnerships.
Erdogan’s diplomatic strategy also presents a fascinating study of the intersection of domestic politics and international diplomacy. Erdogan’s economic outreach to Gulf nations can be seen as a domestic political maneuver aimed at bolstering his standing at home by resolving Turkey’s financial crises. This is evidenced by the Turkey’s intensified focus on investment and trade with the Gulf Arab states, as Erdogan aims to counteract the weak lira, the seven-fold increased budget deficit, and the soaring inflation rate, which stands at about 40%.
However, it’s critical to note that the success of Erdogan’s strategy is predicated on the economic diversification plans of Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE. These plans hinge on foreign investment and trade, with Turkey providing these Gulf Arab states with crucial know-how, technology, and non-oil investment opportunities.
Furthermore, in an environment characterized by geopolitical competition and shifting alliances, Erdogan may also strategically seize upon the reported rising Emirati-Saudi competition to secure further investment. This competition, if effectively exploited, could offer Turkey competing investment options that would boost its ailing economy.
While Erdogan’s Middle East tour is couched in pragmatism, it brings to the fore significant geopolitical complexities and challenges. Although the immediate economic benefits are clear, the potential geopolitical repercussions are profound. Erdogan’s strategy demonstrates an intriguing blend of economic pragmatism, strategic maneuvering, and opportunistic diplomacy. It underscores the shifting nature of alliances and the inherent unpredictability of international politics.
The long-term efficacy of Erdogan’s strategy will not only be determined by the influx of Gulf Arab money but also by the evolving geopolitical dynamics in the region. Therefore, it is essential to critically evaluate and continually monitor this fluid geopolitical landscape to gain a nuanced understanding of the underlying currents that shape international diplomacy.
Adding to the narrative of Erdogan’s regional strategy, the role of normalization efforts with other Middle Eastern countries is fundamental. Despite considerable successes in building bridges with Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE, Erdogan’s diplomatic journey has not been without its pitfalls. Most notable among these is the continued failure to normalize relations with Syria. This failure is particularly glaring in the context of his recent diplomatic victories, pointing to the limits of Erdogan’s regional outreach.
Erdogan’s continued inability to forge a constructive dialogue with Syria is indicative of the profound historical, political, and strategic challenges that continue to strain bilateral relations. While the reasons behind the enduring deadlock are manifold, the fact remains that the failure to engage with Syria signifies a substantial diplomatic gap in Erdogan’s regional maneuverings. It is a stark reminder that while pragmatic economic considerations may momentarily mask deep-rooted political divergences, they cannot entirely circumvent them.
However, Erdogan’s normalization efforts extend beyond the Gulf, with Egypt marking a significant aspect of this diplomatic endeavor. The anticipated visit of Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi to Ankara further demonstrates Erdogan’s intent to recalibrate Turkey’s relations with its neighbors. It signals a new chapter in Turkish-Egyptian relations after years of political tensions primarily stemming from ideological differences and regional rivalries. Yet, it remains to be seen whether this visit will herald a new era of robust cooperation or merely serve as a symbolic gesture of goodwill.
Beyond the regional scope, Erdogan’s diplomatic courting also extends to Israel and Palestine. The forthcoming visit of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu to Turkey signals Erdogan’s ambition to position Turkey as an influential player in the Middle East peace process. The balancing act of hosting both leaders in close proximity is a testament to Erdogan’s intricate diplomatic dance. It reveals his aspiration to foster ties with key regional players while possibly mediating in one of the world’s most intractable conflicts.
In essence, Erdogan’s diplomacy encapsulates a multidimensional strategy aimed at economic revival, regional realignment, and international influence. However, the mixed bag of successes and failures serves as a cautionary reminder of the challenging path ahead. While economic considerations can foster diplomatic rapprochements, they are not panaceas for deeply entrenched political disputes. Consequently, Erdogan’s regional strategy warrants continued observation to understand its impact on Turkey’s economic recovery and geopolitical standing fully.
All publishing rights and copyrights reserved to MENA Research and Study Center.
