In the vast tapestry of human civilizations, the defining triumphs often emerge from the nurturing embrace of democratic principles and the sacred bond of a social contract. Throughout history, the shores of Europe and the Western world have witnessed the fruits of enlightenment and reform, with societies flourishing under the umbrella of constitutional government and the separation of powers. Beyond these horizons, however, lies an area where the shadows of autocracy loom large, hindering progress and stunting the aspirations of millions. Plagued by a relentless cycle of one-man rule, the Middle East has fallen into a self-perpetuating trap that hinders its long-term success. This article explores the dangers of a system that places the individual above the constitution, the consequences that follow, and the urgent need for change. As a poignant example, we will examine the rule of Recep Tayyip Erdogan in Türkiye.
In true democracies, the primary responsibility of public officials lies not with individuals or families, but with the very essence of their society-the constitution. It is the guiding light, the compass that directs their actions. Such noble devotion ensures that power remains at the service of the people, not the other way around. Türkiye, however, under the leadership of Erdogan and his Justice and Development Party (AKP), is a prime example of the dangers of one-man rule and the erosion of democratic values.
Türkiye, once considered a beacon of hope for democratic reform in the Middle East, has succumbed to the lure of one-man rule under Erdogan’s tenure. As he rose to power, Erdogan skillfully used democracy as a tool to position himself as a champion of the people. Over time, however, he consolidated his authority and gradually abandoned democratic principles, undermining the very institutions designed to uphold the rule of law.
Similar to autocrats of the past, Erdogan exerted control over the press, silenced dissenting voices, and manipulated public opinion to solidify his grip on power. Through strategic appointments and purges, he ensured the loyalty of officials in the armed forces, law enforcement, the judiciary, and other key institutions. These once-independent pillars of democracy became pawns in Erdogan’s quest for absolute authority, abandoning their responsibility to the constitution and the people they were meant to serve.
Under Erdogan’s rule, Türkiye has seen a disheartening erosion of democratic principles and an alarming concentration of power. Dissent was met with repression, journalists were jailed, and political opponents were silenced. Erdogan’s autocratic tendencies extended to the business sector, where cronyism and favoritism became pervasive, compromising the integrity of economic governance.
Moreover, Erdogan’s tenure was marked by a deliberate blurring of the lines between the state and the ruling party, undermining the separation of powers that is the bedrock of democratic systems. By consolidating power in his own hands and promoting loyalty over competence, Erdogan created a climate in which the rule of law was subordinated to his personal agenda.
But history teaches us that no autocrat can maintain an iron grip on power indefinitely. The foundations of one-man rule are built on a mirage that dissipates over time. As the tides of change begin to turn, those who were once ardent supporters of the autocrat find themselves cast aside, their value diminished in the new political landscape. They too become victims of their own misplaced loyalty, realizing too late that their loyalty to an individual has rendered them irrelevant in a system that values constitutional principles above all else.
The Erdogan era in Türkiye serves as a powerful example of the fallacies and dangers of one-man rule. Just as the Middle East has struggled to free itself from the clutches of autocracy, Türkiye has been caught in a vicious cycle of power consolidation and the erosion of democratic values. The mirage of Erdogan’s indispensability and his manipulation of democratic processes have hindered Türkiye’s progress and undermined its democratic institutions.
Erdogan’s rise to power was accompanied by promises of democratic reform and progress. However, as he consolidated his authority, he moved away from democratic principles and gradually dismantled the checks and balances that ensure a fair and accountable system of governance. Like a master illusionist, Erdogan used the facade of democracy to cement his grip on power, exploiting its mechanisms for personal gain and to perpetuate his rule.
The erosion of press freedom and the suppression of dissent became emblematic of Erdogan’s regime. Journalists critical of the government were arrested, media outlets were closed, and independent voices were silenced. The once vibrant landscape of public discourse was transformed into an echo chamber of propaganda, where Erdogan’s narrative dominated and dissent was silenced. This manipulation of the media allowed Erdogan to maintain a tight grip on public perception and further consolidate his power.
Moreover, Erdogan’s influence extended to the judiciary, as he appointed judges and prosecutors loyal to his agenda. The impartiality and independence of the judiciary were compromised, undermining the foundations of a fair and just legal system. Cases against political opponents and critics of the government became tools of repression, highlighting the erosion of the rule of law and the subordination of the judiciary to political interests.
The concentration of power in Erdogan’s hands culminated in constitutional amendments that expanded the powers of the presidency. These changes further weakened the separation of powers and blurred the lines between the executive, legislative and judicial branches. The presidency became a vehicle for unchecked authority, eroding Türkiye’s democratic fabric and undermining the principles of accountability and transparency.
Despite the trappings of one-man rule, however, the real power lies with the people. Like a dormant volcano, the Turkish people have been simmering with a desire for change and the restoration of democratic values. In recent years, we have witnessed the emergence of a resilient civil society, the reawakening of a free press, and a resurgence of political opposition. These forces have challenged Erdogan’s illusion of invincibility, reclaimed the spirit of democratic governance, and signaled the possibility of a brighter future.
The Erdogan era in Türkiye stands as a cautionary tale, a vivid example of the dangers of one-man rule. By eroding democratic values, manipulating institutions, and concentrating power, Erdogan has stifled progress and undermined Türkiye’s democratic fabric. However, the resilience of the Turkish people and their unwavering commitment to democratic principles offer hope for a future in which the constitution, not the individual, serves as the guiding light.
As the Middle East seeks progress and long-term success, it must heed the lessons of the Erdogan era. The mirage of one-man rule, with its false promises of stability and prosperity, is a stumbling block on the path to democratic governance and societal progress. Only by embracing the primacy of the constitution, fostering a culture of accountability, and nurturing democratic institutions can the Middle East break out of this cycle and realize its true potential as a beacon of democracy and human flourishing. The struggle for democratic values and the rejection of one-man rule are critical steps toward creating a region that values the social contract, upholds the separation of powers, and empowers its people to shape their collective destiny.
All publishing rights and copyrights reserved to MENA Research and Study Center.